<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Critique Groups Develop Writers</title> <atom:link href="http://angiesdiary.com/2010/05/critique-groups-develop-writers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://angiesdiary.com/articles/creativity/critique-groups-develop-writers/</link> <description>Online Writing Magazine</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Nancy Duci Denofio</title><link>http://angiesdiary.com/articles/creativity/critique-groups-develop-writers/#comment-13812</link> <dc:creator>Nancy Duci Denofio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:58:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://angiesdiary.com/?p=2937#comment-13812</guid> <description>I have been involved with the editing process and believe if someone is honest and upfront - working one on one - the writer tends to see his or her mistakes.  This has occured both on and off line.As for Critique processing and different genre - it has a great deal to do with how one goes about it.  For instance, poetry is personal, memoirs need a great interviewer to get all the nooks and crannies out of someones mind, but a novel can be one of the best places for groups gathering to critique.I must agree, some writers are good writers who only need editing - while others want to tell a story or stories, and learn the process.  It&#039;s never a bad idea to become better - in what ever it is you pondor for each audience.I have taught authors how to change long work into smaller works and they flow so easy - and they understand a few words off here or there means a world of difference.Great article.
Always, Nancy</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been involved with the editing process and believe if someone is honest and upfront &#8211; working one on one &#8211; the writer tends to see his or her mistakes.  This has occured both on and off line.</p><p>As for Critique processing and different genre &#8211; it has a great deal to do with how one goes about it.  For instance, poetry is personal, memoirs need a great interviewer to get all the nooks and crannies out of someones mind, but a novel can be one of the best places for groups gathering to critique.</p><p>I must agree, some writers are good writers who only need editing &#8211; while others want to tell a story or stories, and learn the process.  It&#8217;s never a bad idea to become better &#8211; in what ever it is you pondor for each audience.</p><p>I have taught authors how to change long work into smaller works and they flow so easy &#8211; and they understand a few words off here or there means a world of difference.</p><p>Great article.<br
/> Always, Nancy</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack Eason</title><link>http://angiesdiary.com/articles/creativity/critique-groups-develop-writers/#comment-13796</link> <dc:creator>Jack Eason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:08:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://angiesdiary.com/?p=2937#comment-13796</guid> <description>Angeline, my publisher runs an in-house site where all of us publishing under its banner can leave whatever we&#039;re working on for constructive criticism and comments.I don&#039;t necessarily agree with the statement - &quot;There are no great writers, just great re-writers.&quot; however. Many fine works are out their in book land that, apart from minor editing, are essentially original i.e. corrected first drafts.If by the statement you are referring the whole editing process, then yes, in that case I do agree.Great article. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angeline, my publisher runs an in-house site where all of us publishing under its banner can leave whatever we&#8217;re working on for constructive criticism and comments.</p><p>I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with the statement &#8211; &#8220;There are no great writers, just great re-writers.&#8221; however. Many fine works are out their in book land that, apart from minor editing, are essentially original i.e. corrected first drafts.</p><p>If by the statement you are referring the whole editing process, then yes, in that case I do agree.</p><p>Great article. <img
src='http://cdn.angiesdiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: C. Meltzer</title><link>http://angiesdiary.com/articles/creativity/critique-groups-develop-writers/#comment-1017</link> <dc:creator>C. Meltzer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:28:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://angiesdiary.com/?p=2937#comment-1017</guid> <description>Thanks for the informative post. My wife&#039;s calling me for dinner So I require to operate off without reading as much as I&#039;d like. But I put your weblog on my RSS feed so that I can read a lot more.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the informative post. My wife&#8217;s calling me for dinner So I require to operate off without reading as much as I&#8217;d like. But I put your weblog on my RSS feed so that I can read a lot more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cervix Anatomixus</title><link>http://angiesdiary.com/articles/creativity/critique-groups-develop-writers/#comment-771</link> <dc:creator>Cervix Anatomixus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:01:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://angiesdiary.com/?p=2937#comment-771</guid> <description>hi partner,I truly hope you  post again soon. many thanks for sharing your know-how</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi partner,I truly hope you  post again soon. many thanks for sharing your know-how</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Angie</title><link>http://angiesdiary.com/articles/creativity/critique-groups-develop-writers/#comment-651</link> <dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:21:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://angiesdiary.com/?p=2937#comment-651</guid> <description>Thank you for this contribution, dear Angeline. I&#039;m sure many of us (including myself) didn&#039;t consider this seriously yet, but it makes a lot of sense.
Angie
.-= Angie´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AngiesDiary/~3/UcmvdQV_QWQ/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Illegal&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this contribution, dear Angeline. I&#8217;m sure many of us (including myself) didn&#8217;t consider this seriously yet, but it makes a lot of sense.<br
/> Angie<br
/> .-= Angie´s last blog ..<a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AngiesDiary/~3/UcmvdQV_QWQ/">Illegal</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: angiesdiary.com @ 2012-05-22 13:47:15 by W3 Total Cache -->
